Dr. Sahar Ahmadzadeh (Director)

Dr.Shamsuddeen

Muhammad(Seminar lead)

Portfolio (Anonymous) An artificial

Intelligence portfolio ofvariousinstruments

Assessmentlimits:

length,load,wordcount, etc.

Is this exempt from anonymousmarking

underthepolicy?

Youarerequiredto completethebelow task:

IndividualAssignment:100Marks

This coursework will assess your artificial intelligence-related skills in real life scenarios/problems.

You must work on your coursework, for example building Intelligent Tutoring System for Math. The topics provided in the assignment (Math, Chemistry, etc.) areverybroad,soyoumustnarrowdownthetopictoasmallpartthatcanbesolved. For instance, teaching students how to calculate the area of different shapes, e.g., triangle, square, etc. Please make assumptions whenever needed to clarify and justify your point of view.

Deliverables:

Each student is required to produce and submit through Moodle the following requirements.

Areportinwordformat.Thisreportisexpectedtocontainthefollowing sections:

1. Introduction:tosetthescene fortheproblem
2. Project plan: to explain who is doing what, milestones and other project planning aspects.
3. Literature review: to describe the state-of-the-art Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Hence, you are expected to list the main ITSs in your domain and criticise their structure, mechanisms, knowledge representation, interaction with users, etc.
4. DevelopmentofyourIntelligentTutoringSystem:todescribethedomain you are working in, the steps you used to develop your ITS, any limitations, to mention but a few. A prototype of ITS in a specific domain (Math, Chemistry, etc.) based on your topic. This prototype should be developed using: (i) Protégé ontology development editor which will produce a web ontology language file (OWL) and (ii) any programming language (Java, Python, etc.) to create user interfaces.
5. Conclusion:tosummarisethesolution,lessonslearntandreflections.
6. References: to list all references used in creating your report. You should use Harvard referencing style.

Here are some useful resources on how to do that, other resources can be found online: https://www.yorksj.ac.uk/students/referencing/referencing-guides/

ThemainpurposeofyourreportistodescribeyourITSandthestepscarriedoutto developit.However,youcandiscussmanyissues,forexampleyoucansummarise

YoumustsuccessfullyachievethefollowingLearningOutcomestopassthis assessment:

ThiscourseworkisdesignedtoachievethefollowingPLOs:

1. Apply the findings of advanced scholarship and/or contemporary research and practice to the solution of computer science problems
   1. Critically evaluate computer science problems, including those at the forefront of field.
   2. Demonstrate operation within applicable professional, legal, social and ethical frameworks.
   3. Demonstrateoriginalityandcreativityinthesolutionofcomputerscience problems.

7.7Applystandards,qualityprocessesandengineeringprinciplestothesolutionof computer science problems

Adviceand Guidance

• Thefirstandthesecondtasks MUSTBeidentical.
• Eachassessmenttaskwillhaveitssubmissionlinkand deadline.
• You are expected to submit original and reflective text. Please useproper referencing techniques to avoid plagiarism.
• Thereshouldbeafullreferencelistattheendofthereport.

• Ahighlevelofunderstandingofthesubjectmustbedemonstrated.

  Itisimportantthatthecontentisunderpinnedwiththeinclusionofrelevant academic theory, concepts, and models where appropriate, as well as contemporary industrial insights. These should be accurately cited and referenced according to York St John Harvard Referencing throughout.

Yourworkwillbemarkedaccordingtotheassessmentinstructionsprovidedwithinthisdocument and the selected Learning Outcomes’ (LOs) (see above).

Furthermore, this assessment is marked using the assessment marking criteria or a similar rubric thatalignswiththeUniversity’sGenericAssessmentDescriptors(seebelow).1Thisistoensureall assessment decisions are comparable regardless of the discipline or mode of assessment.

Please note that you must meet the required baseline standards (50 – 59%) which will include the LOs and minimum expectations of the assessment. Further still, you must ensure you meet the requirements of each grade boundary to progress to the next, i.e., you should demonstrate your learning throughthe standards of the Pass, Merit and Distinction to reacha Distinction (70 – 84%).

Thesestandardsaredesignedtoscaffoldandbuildyourlearningtoachieveyourfullestpotentialin each criterion being assessed.

Please refer to the York St John University Code of Practice for Assessment and Academic Related Matters 2022-23.

We ask that you pay particular attention to the academic misconduct policy. Penalties will be applied where a student is found guilty of academic and/or ethical misconduct, including termination of programme (Policy Link).

Youarerequired to keep tothewordlimit setforanassessmentand tonotethatyoumaybe subjecttopenaltyifyouexceedthatlimit.Youarerequiredtoprovideanaccuratewordcount on the cover sheet for each piece of work you submit (Policy Link).

For late or non-submission of work by the published deadline or an approved extended deadline,amarkof0NSwillberecorded.Whereare-assessmentopportunityexists,astudent willnormallybepermittedonlyoneattempttobere-assessedforacappedmark(PolicyLink).

An extension to the published deadline may be granted to an individual student if they meet the eligibility criteria of the (Policy Link).

Pleaseseetheassessmentcriteria below.

Introduce the project, explaining the relevance of your ITS and the problemitaddresses.Learnershould demonstrate good knowledge of AI algorithms Techniques. Learners should provide a rationale for the

choicestheyhavemade.

ThinkingSkills And

Practical and Professional LearningSkills

Description

Learner should identify the requirements for The Intelligent Tutoring System (Ontology & Application).Describethestepsin developing your ITS, including ontology creation, interface development, and limitations.

Development

Create a domain-specific ontology using Protégé, covering key concepts andrelationshipsinyoursubjectarea.

User Interface Development Developafunctionaluserinterface using Java, Python, etc., which interactswiththeontologytoguide the user.

Integration and Functionality Ensure that the interface properly communicateswiththeontologyand provides a seamless learning experience.

15

20

10

5

PassGradeBands(100–50)(LearningOutcomesmustbe met)

FailGradeBands(49–0)(LearningOutcomesarenotmet)

Assessors, pleaseinsertyourownassessmentmarkingcriteriarelevantthismodulewhichprovidesfurtherdetailanddisciplinaryspecificity, etc. For more information on how to use the GAD to guide your assessment marking criteria visit Marking Criteria.

Distinction(70–

84)

BorderlineFail(45

- 49)

Introduction

(ThinkingSkills)

10

Marks

ProjectPlan

(Professional Conventions)

The project plan covers most roles andresponsibilities, withkeymilestones identified. The use of project management tools and techniques is soundbutmaylack depth in certain areas, such as risk management or adaptation strategies.

Timelines aremostly realistic, but some milestones may not be well- defined.Overall,the plan is functionalbut could benefit from more clarity or detail.

Theprojectplanis thorough and clearly structured, coveringmost roles, responsibilities, and milestones in great detail.

Appropriateproject management techniques are used, andtimelines are realistic. Theremaybeminorgaps in detailing risk management or contingency plans, but overall, the projectplaniswell- considered and actionable. The plan demonstrates strong time management and task delegation skills.

The project plan includes only minimal roles and responsibilities,with fewmilestones identified. Project management techniques are either not present or are poorly developed,andthe plan lacks clear timelines or risk management strategies.

Milestonesmaybe overly broad or unclear, making it difficult to track project progress effectively.

Theprojectplan is incomplete, with little to no mentionofroles, responsibilities, or milestones.

There is little evidenceof project management approaches,and timelines are vagueorabsent. The plan does not offer a coherent structure for tracking progress, and key project phases are missing.

10

Marks

Literature Review

(ResearchSkills)

10

Marks

Your Intelligent Tutoring System(ITS) Description &Development

(ThinkingSkills And

Practical and Professional LearningSkills)

Basic identification of requirements; schema design with minimal Intelligent TutoringSystem (Ontology &Application.

The ontology covers basic concepts and relationships relevant to the subject domain but lacks depth and completeness. Certain key relationships maybemissing, or the structure maybeunclear.

The interface is functional but may be rudimentary or less user- friendly. Basic interactionswith theontologyare possible,butthe overall design lacks polish or sophistication.

Goodidentification of requirements; schema design with focus on Deployment of the system to the production environment to compliance with security standards andbestpractices.

The ontology includes most key concepts and relationships relevant to the subject domain. Whilethestructure is generally clear, somerelationships maybe missing or underdeveloped.

The user interface is functional but may lack some advancedfeatures orbelessintuitive. Itinteractswiththe ontology, but the design could be improved in terms of usability or visual appeal.

The interface communicates

Thorough requirements identificationfor

Deployment of thesystemtothe production environment to compliance with security standards and best practices.

The ontology is comprehensive,  coveringmostkeyconcepts and relationships with a high degree of accuracy. The structureislogical and supports effective interaction with the ITS.

The user interfaceis functional and easytonavigate. It integrates well withtheontology and provides a good user experience. All key features are present, though there may be minor room for

Exceptional identification of requirements; schema fully deployment of the system to theproductionenvironmentto compliance with security standards and best practices with advanced optimization.

The ontology is highly comprehensive, covering all relevant concepts and relationshipswithexceptional clarity. Demonstrates deep understanding of the subject domain, and the ontology is structured effectively for use inanITS.Includesadvanced features such as constraints, properties, and custom classes.

Exceptional UI: Highly intuitive,visuallyappealing, and fully functional.

Demonstrates a user- centereddesignthatallows seamless navigation, interactive feedback, and clear interaction with the ontology. All required functionalities are present, and additional advanced features may be implemented.

Flawlessintegration: The interface

Incomplete  identification of requirements; schema lacks properdeployment of the system to the production environment to compliance with security standards andbestpractices.

The ontology includessome keyconcepts,but it lacks coherence, and severalimportant relationships are missing. The structure may be poorly organized.

MinimalUI: The interfaceallows for basic interactionswith theontologybut isnotintuitiveor aesthetically pleasing. Many functionalities may be underdeveloped or missing.

Poor requirements identification; weak schema design and lack ofdeploymentof the system tothe production environment to compliance with security standards and best practices.

Theontologyis incomplete,with many criticalconcepts and relationships either missing or incorrectly represented.

The overall structure is unclearand difficult to follow.

Theinterfaceis either non- functional or severelylacking in key features. It provideslittleor no meaningful interaction with the ontology, and the design

Noidentification ofrequirements; no schema or deployment of the system to the production environment to compliancewith security standards and best practices.

The ontology is either non- existent or includesveryfew conceptsandrelationships,with no discernible structure. Littleto no effort is shownindomain representation.

Non-functional UI: The user interfaceis missing or so incompletethat it does not enable any meaningful interactionwith the ontology.

50

Marks

improvementin aesthetics or usability.

Strongintegration: The interface communicates effectively with the ontology, though minor inefficienciesmay exist.Overall,the userinteractionis smooth,withonly occasionaldelays orsmalltechnical issues.

isconfusingor unresponsive.

Majorintegration issues: The interfacefailsto communicate properly with the ontology.

Errors,lags,or crashes are common, and the system is largely unusable.

Conclusion

(ThinkingSkills)

The project outcome is summarized thoroughly, with a clear explanation of key achievementsand challenges faced duringtheproject. The lessons learned demonstratea strong level of reflection, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement.

Future  improvementsare well thought out and feasible, showing a good understanding of potential next steps and areas that could be enhanced.

The project outcome ispoorly summarized,with critical aspects either missing or inaccurately described.There is little to no reflection on the lessonslearned, andanymention of future improvements is superficial or irrelevant. The summary demonstrates minimal engagement

withtheproject’s successes or challenges.

The project outcomeiseither not summarized or is so incompletethatit lacks any meaningful information.

There is no mention of lessons learned, and future improvementsare either non- existent or irrelevant. The summary shows no understanding or engagement with the project.

10

marks

References

(Professional Conventions)

10

marks