Assignment help
Join our 150К of happy users
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
7043SSL Organizations and Strategy Assignment help
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It must not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact your Module Leader.
Contents:
Assignment Information
Assignment Task
Marking and Feedback
Assessed Module Learning Outcomes
Assignment Support and Academic Integrity
Assessment Marking Criteria
The work you submit for this assignment must be your own independent work, or in the case of a group assignment your own groups’ work. More information is available in the ‘Assignment Task’ section of this assignment brief.
Assignment Information
Module Name: Organisations and Strategy
Module Code: 7043SSL
Assignment Title: Individual Report (Coursework 3) Assignment Due: 06/12/2024 18:00 UK time Assignment Credit: 5 credits
Word Count (or equivalent): 1,000 words
There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark (after internal moderation) for work exceeding the word limit by 10% or more. The word limit includes quotations and citations, but excludes the references list.
Assignment Type: Standard
Percentage Grade (Applied Core Assessment). You will be provided with an overall grade between 0% and 100%. You have one opportunity to pass the assignment at or above 40%.
Assignment Task
This assignment is an individual assignment.
This assignment requires you to consider organisations that operate in the construction industry
and to write a report that addresses the following task:
Critically evaluate how industry structure affects organisational culture and ethical conduct. Use examples of specific organisations to aid your analysis and provide recommendations to resolve the ethical dilemma.
To perform this task, you should first analyse the industry or sector environment to understand the competitive pressures organisations are exposed to. To aid your analysis, you should then consider organisation(s) that gained attention through ethical misconduct. After examining their organisational structure and culture, a critical evaluation of the organisations’ ethical behaviour in the context of strategic decision making might follow. It is expected that you evaluate to what extent organisations in that particular industry have the freedom to proactively adopt ethical practices.
Note: You are expected to use insight obtained from the core textbook, relevant additional reading from the lectures (available on Aula) and your own research using the University’s library facilities (locate.coventry.ac.uk).
Your report should follow the below structure:
-Introduction – 200 words
-Discussion and critical evaluation – 600 words
-Conclusion and recommendations – 200 words
Submission Instructions:
You must submit your work through Aula by the submission deadline. You can access the submission link through the module web.
Your coursework will be given a zero mark if you do not submit a copy through Aula. Please take care to ensure that you have fully submitted your work.
Please ensure that you have submitted your work using the correct file format, unreadable files will receive a mark of zero. You should submit in Microsoft Word format and not PDF.
All work submitted after the submission deadline without a valid and approved reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero.
The University wants you to do your best. However we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you can’t submit your coursework by the deadline – these events should be beyond your control and not easy to predict. If this happens, you can apply for an extension to your deadline for up to 5 working days, or if you need longer, you can apply for a deferral, which takes you to the next assessment period (for example, to the resit period following the main Assessment Boards). You must apply before the deadline.
You will find information about the process and what is or is not considered to be an event beyond your control at https://share.coventry.ac.uk/students/Registry/Pages/Deferrals-and- Extension.aspx
Students MUST keep a copy and/or an electronic file of their assignment.
Checks will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites.
Marking and Feedback
How will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment will be marked by the module team.
How will I receive my grades and feedback?
Provisional marks will be released once internally moderated.
Feedback will be provided by the module team alongside grades release.
Your provisional marks and feedback should be available within 2 weeks (10 working days).
What will I be marked against?
Details of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief.
Assessed Module Learning Outcomes
The Learning Outcomes for this module align to the marking criteria which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure successful achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:
3. Critically evaluate organisational culture and business ethics, and their relations to organisational strategy in a multinational organisational context.
Assignment Support and Academic Integrity
If you have any questions about this assignment please see the Student Guidance on Coursework for more information.
Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar:
You are expected to use effective, accurate, and appropriate language within this assessment task.
Academic Integrity:
The work you submit must be your own, or in the case of groupwork, that of your group. All sources of information need to be acknowledged and attributed; therefore, you must provide references for all sources of information and acknowledge any tools used in the production of your work, including Artificial Intelligence (AI). We use detection software and make routine checks for evidence of academic misconduct.
Definitions of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and collusion can be found on the Student Portal. All cases of suspected academic misconduct are referred for investigation, the outcomes of which can have profound consequences to your studies. For more information on academic integrity please visit the Academic and Research Integrity section of the Student Portal.
Support for Students with Disabilities or Additional Needs:
If you have a disability, long-term health condition, specific learning difference, mental health diagnosis or symptoms and have discussed your support needs with health and wellbeing you may be able to access support that will help with your studies.
If you feel you may benefit from additional support, but have not disclosed a disability to the University, or have disclosed but are yet to discuss your support needs it is important to let us know so we can provide the right support for your circumstances. Visit the Student Portal to find out more.
Unable to Submit on Time?
The University wants you to do your best. However, we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you cannot submit your assessment by the deadline or sit a scheduled exam. If you think this might be the case, guidance on understanding what counts as an extenuating circumstance, and how to apply is available on the Student Portal.
Administration of Assessment
Module Leader Name: Dr Mahda Garmaki Module Leader Email: ad3523@coventry.ac.uk Assignment Category: Written
Attempt Type: Standard
Component Code: Cw (Cw3)
Assessment Marking Criteria-
Theory, concepts and models | Analysis, evaluation and application | Critique, conclusions and recommendations | |
80 to 100% | Exceptional understanding of organisational culture theories and concepts and exceptional understanding of business ethics theories and concepts. Outstanding level of independent research to support the analysis. | Exceptional application of frameworks and concepts with exceptional justification thereof. Exceptional evaluation of the link between industry, culture and business ethics with exceptionally well-developed arguments. | Exceptional ability to come to an independent conclusion based on relevant data and facts that have been analysed. Exceptionally well- argued recommendations. |
Exceptional quality of sources and referencing practice. | |||
70 to 79% | Excellent understanding of organisational culture theories and concepts and strong understanding of business ethics theories and concepts. Excellent level of independent research to support the analysis. | Excellent application of frameworks and concepts with strong justification thereof. Excellent evaluation of the link between industry, culture and business ethics with strong well-developed arguments. Excellent quality of sources and referencing practice. | Excellent conclusion with independent thought and strong recommendations that are feasible. Conclusion is based on relevant data and facts. |
60 to 69% | Very good understanding of organisational culture theories and concepts and fairly good understanding of business ethics theories and concepts. Very good level of independent research to support the analysis. | Very good application of frameworks and concepts with fairly good justification thereof. Very good evaluation of the link between industry, culture and business ethics with good arguments. | Very good conclusion with independent thought and feasible recommendations. Conclusion is based on relevant data and facts. |
Quality sources have been used and referencing practice is very good. |
50 to 59% | Good understanding of organisational culture theories and concepts and reasonably good understanding of business ethics theories and concepts. Good level of independent research to support the analysis. | Good application of frameworks and concepts with appropriate justification thereof. Good evaluation of the link between industry, culture and business ethics with reasonably good arguments. Good sources have been used and referencing practice is very good. | Good conclusion with independent thought and feasible recommendations. Conclusion is based on relevant data and facts. |
40 to 49% | Outcomes met. Basic understanding of organisational culture theories and concepts and some understanding of business ethics theories and concepts. Basic level of independent research to support the analysis. | Outcomes met. Basic application of frameworks and concepts with satisfactory justification thereof. Basic evaluation of the link between industry, culture and business ethics. Referencing practice is acceptable. | Outcomes met. Basic conclusion with independent thought and a few feasible recommendations. Conclusion is based on relevant data and facts. |
Fail 30, 35% | Outcomes not met. Limited understanding of organisational culture theories and concepts and limited understanding of business ethics theories and concepts. Limited independent research to support the analysis. | Outcomes not met. Limited application of frameworks and concepts with limited justification thereof. Limited evaluation of the link between industry, culture and business ethics. Referencing practice is poor. | Outcomes not met. Limited independent conclusive thought and not based on relevant data and facts. Recommendations are of poor quality or hard to implement. |
Fail 0 to 29% | Outcomes not met. Minimal understanding of organisational culture theories and concepts and little or no understanding of business ethics theories and concepts. Little or no independent research to support the analysis. | Outcomes not met. Minimal application of frameworks and concepts with little or no justification thereof. Insufficient or no evaluation of the link between industry, culture and business ethics. Referencing practice is very poor. | Outcomes not met. Minimal independent conclusive thought. Recommendations are absent or unfeasible. |
See what sets us apart in HND assignment help. Visit our Google My Business (GMB) profile to read reviews and learn more.
Send Your assignment brief
Share your assignment brief and after Checking assignment requirement expert Will share the quote
Get Quote and pay
Once quote is sent, you can make Payment through secure option after which our team will start work
Get Assignment
Our team will Deliver the work you can share If any feedback