Assignment help
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c12e3/c12e384015d69b34243dd184115e0376a44d42a7" alt=""
Join our 150К of happy users
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c41f/6c41f84b6f1d89bbec8a5f95daeaca63bf6b85ee" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d94fd/d94fd2939799ce4905d0d8b871615ae24b176f62" alt="Card image cap"
LD4022 Introducing Marketing Assignment help
Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA): Please note if your assignment is submitted electronically, it will be submitted online via Turnitin by the given deadline. You will find a Turnitin link on the module’s eLP site. It is your responsibility to ensure that your assignment arrives before the submission deadline stated above. See the University policy on late submission of work.Programme(s) International Year One in Business Module Code & Title: LD4022 Introducing Marketing Distributed on: First week of the semester Submission Time and Date: To be submitted by on TBC @ 11:59 GMT Word Limit: 1500-word report Weighting This coursework accounts for 70% of the total mark for this module Submission of Assessment
Instructions on Assessment
You are to submit a 1500 word report that focuses on a your restaurant offering a new product line/service that they currently DO NOT offer (e.g. Home delivery/cooking kits, frozen supermarket range, drive through, vegan/gluten free menu, mobile food van etc. – be creative!). The report should have the following sections:
1.Descriptive overview of proposed new offering
Briefly introduce the restaurant used in Component 1, Introduce and describe the proposed product/service offering, justifying why it would be successful in the context of your restaurant and linking to ‘Product’ theory. This section should be fully referenced to show where you found the significant details, both industry-based and from academic theory.
2.Strategic and Tactical overview of the proposed new offering
Use this section to provide details of how you will implement your new offering using the remaining parts of the 7Ps framework. Firstly, provide a researched overview of the target market that you are targeting with the new offering. From here, you are required to address each aspect of the 7Ps framework (minus ‘Product’) explaining what recommendations you are making to the restaurant to successfully launch their new offering. For each section, you are required to clearly explain your practical ideas, justify these and link to any academic theory / concepts where appropriate.
Please note you are not required to include a positioning map.
3.Reference list
Adhering to APA standards. This is the full list of references used within the various sections of the report, presented in full (as opposed to an in-text reference, which is how you present references in the main body). Everything in the list should appear in the main report, and everything in the main report should appear in the list. We are looking for you to demonstrate your research ability in identifying good quality sources, being able to use a range of appropriate sources, and being able to deal with an appropriate volume of research.
Marking criteria:
1.Introduction and descriptive overview of the new offering 30%
Coherent descriptions of current snapshot of the company/industry that justifies the new offering, supported by industry research and theory where appropriate.
2.Strategic overview/Tactical overview of new offering: 50%
Comprehensive strategic and tactical overview of the new offering, supported by industry references.
Correct identification and application of relevant marketing theory to support discussion.
3.Reference list scrutiny (Depth/quality of research, APA usage): 10%
Considering the quality, depth and breadth of the research, looking for a good balance
between industry information (databases, company info, environmental info), and academic research (journal articles, textbooks), accuracy of APA formatting. Avoiding unsuitable/poor quality resources e.g., Wikipedia, Marketing91, Tutor4U, QuickMBA etc.
4.Presentation/professionalism: 10%
Considering professional appearance of the work, appropriate language (3rd person narrative, formal) and layout, neatness, readability, use of report format (headings, subheadings, contents page), correct use of appendices, etc.
Mapping to Programme Goals and Objectives
The assessment has been designed to assess the module learning outcomes (MLOs), which themselves contribute to the programme learning outcomes (PLOs):
Knowledgeable and Understanding:
Students will be able to:
1.Identify contemporary professional practice in business and management and understand how it is informed by theory and research.
2.Use knowledge of business and management to solve complex problems related to professional practice, thereby identifying justifiable solutions.
Intellectual / Professional skills & abilities:
Students will be able to:
1.Demonstrate effective interpersonal communication skills and the ability to work in multi-cultural teams.
2.Describe evidence of their self-reflection as a means of informing personal development planning.
3.Participate and engage in activities which demonstrate an understanding of the style of undergraduate learning in the UK.
Personal Values Attributes (Global / Cultural Awareness, Ethics, Curiosity):
Students will be able to:
1.Undertake innovative project work and research
2.Identify an awareness of the cultural and ethical contexts in which international business operates
3.Cultivate a professional approach to study and learning appropriate to transfer to level 5
Mapping to Module Goals and Objectives
This assessment will contribute directly to the following Module goals and objectives:
Knowledge & Understanding:
1. Demonstrate an understanding of the essential principles of Marketing theory and their application in a variety of situations and organisations (MLO1)
2. Demonstrate the ability to understand and apply Marketing principles in given scenarios to assist in the solution of marketing problems. (MLO2)
Intellectual / Professional skills & abilities:
1. Analyse marketing problems; identify and justify solutions and consider their potential success. (MLO3)
2. Present solutions to marketing problems through effective teamwork and associated communication. (MLO4)
3. Develop research skills appropriate to the assessment of your chosen marketing topic. (MLO5)
ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS
You are advised to read the guidance for students regarding assessment policies. They are available online here.
Academic Misconduct
The Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards (ARTA) contain the Regulations and procedures applying to cheating, plagiarism, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems, and other forms of academic misconduct.
The full policy is available here
You are reminded that plagiarism, collusion, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems, and other forms of academic misconduct, as referred to in the Academic Misconduct procedure of the assessment regulations, are taken very seriously. Assignments in which evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic misconduct is found may receive a mark of zero.
Late submission of work
Where coursework is submitted without approval, after the published hand-in deadline, the following penalties will apply. For coursework submitted up to 1 working day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline without approval, 10% of the total marks available for the assessment (i.e.100%) shall be deducted from the assessment mark.
For clarity: a late piece of work that would have scored 65%, 55% or 45% had it been handed in on time will be awarded 55%, 45% or 35% respectively as 10% of the total available marks will have been deducted.
The Penalty does not apply to Pass/Fail Modules, i.e. there will be no penalty for late submission if assessments on Pass/Fail are submitted up to 1 working day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline.
Coursework submitted more than 1 day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline without approval will be marked as zero but will be eligible for referral. The reassessment should where appropriate, and as determined by the Module Leader, be the same method (e.g. essay) but maybe with a different task (e.g. different essay title) or with the same task (e.g. the same essay title) as indicated in the Module handbook.
In modules where there is more than one assessment component, Students are not required to complete all assessment components if an overall Pass Mark (40% UG, 50% PGT) has been achieved.
The only permitted exception will be in cases where the University is prevented from doing so by a PSRB requirement. In the case of PSRB requirements, a variation order will be required from the regulations.
In modules, where there is more than one assessment component and an overall pass mark has not been achieved, Students will be eligible for a referral* in the individual failed module and/or not attempted component(s) of assessment.
These provisions apply to all assessments, including those assessed on a Pass/Fail basis.
The full policy can be found here
Word limits
If the assignment is within +10% of the stated word limit no penalty will apply.
The word count is to be declared on the front page of your assignment and the assignment cover sheet. The word count does not include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The word count is to be declared on the front page of your assignment and the assignment cover sheet. The word count does not include:
Please note, in text citations [e.g. (Smith, 2011)] and direct secondary quotations [e.g. “dib-dab nonsense analysis” (Smith, 2011 p.123)] are INCLUDED in the word count.
If this word count is falsified, students are reminded that under ARTA this will be regarded as academic misconduct.
For those assessments where students are required to keep to the word limit, it is proposed that they should be informed that the marker will stop reading at the point when they judge that the word limit exceeds the recommended word count by more than 10%. The marker will indicate the point at which they stop reading on the text.
Students must retain an electronic copy of this assignment (including ALL appendices) and it must be made available within 24hours of them requesting it be submitted.
The full Word Limit Policy is available here
Note: For those assessments or partial assessments based on calculation, multiple choice etc., marks will be gained on an accumulative basis. In these cases, marks allocated to each section will be made clear
Referencing your work
In-text citations give brief details of the work you are referring to in your text. References are listed at the end of the text in alphabetical order by the author's name. The general format of an electronic journal reference in the APA style is shown below:
Coutu, D. (2009). Why Teams Don't Work. Harvard Business Review, 87, 5, 98-105. Retrieved 29th April 2012 from EBSCO http://searchebscohost.com
Author/s name and initials are listed first, followed by year of publication in brackets. Then there is the title of article and the journal where the article appears, which is in italics. Then state the volume and issue number (in brackets) along with the pages where article can be located. Finally add the date the article was retrieved and then the name of the database, followed by the web address. Wherever possible use the homepage URL rather than the full and extended web address.
For further information on why it is important to reference accurately go to the Referencing and Plagiarism topic in Skills Plus available from the Library website:
www.northumbria.ac.uk/skillsplus
You will find other useful help guides on Skills Plus to help you with the skills involved in writing your assessments and preparing for exams. For further information on the APA style of referencing see the Concise Rules of APA style and the APA website.
Criteria | Does Not Meet Standards | Meets Standards | Exceeds Standards | |||||
Completely insufficient | Insufficient
| Adequate
| Good
| Very Good
| Excellent
| Outstanding
| Exemplary
| |
0 – 29% | 30 – 39% | 40 – 49% | 50 – 59% | 60 – 69% | 70 – 79% | 80 – 89% | 90 – 100% | |
Introduction and descriptive overview of the new offering
Coherent descriptions of current snapshot of the company/industry that justifies the new offering, supported by industry research and theory where appropriate.
30%
| Work not submitted OR evidence of serious academic misconduct.
No evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to Level 4
| Insufficient ability to critically inform knowledge and understanding of the chosen product offering
Insufficiant descriptions of the company and new offering
| Adequate ability to critically inform knowledge and understand of theory and models associated with new product launches and market entry
Adequate descriptions of the company and their new offering | Good ability to critically inform knowledge and understand of theory and models associated with new product launches and market entry
Good detail and descriptions of the company and their new offering | Very good ability to critically inform knowledge and understand of theory and models associated with new product launches and market entry
Very good detail descriptions of the company and their new offering | Excellent ability to critically inform knowledge and understand of theory and models associated with new product launches and market entry
Excellent detail and descriptions of the company and their new offering | Outstanding ability to critically inform knowledge and understand of theory and models associated with new product launches and market entry
Outstanding detail and descriptions of the company and their new offering | Exemplary ability to critically inform knowledge and understand of theory and models associated with new product launches and market entry
Exemplary descriptions of the company and their new offering |
Strategic overview/Tactical overview of new offering:
Comprehensive strategic and tactical overview of the new offering, supported by industry references. 50%
| Work not submitted OR evidence of serious academic misconduct.
No evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to Level 4
| Insufficient strategic and tactical overview of the new offering, supported by industry references. | Adequate strategic and tactical overview of the new offering, supported by industry references. | Good strategic and tactical overview of the new offering, supported by industry references. | Very good strategic and tactical overview of the new offering, supported by industry references. | Excellent strategic and tactical overview of the new offering, supported by industry references. | Outstanding strategic and tactical overview of the new offering, supported by industry references. | Exemplary strategic and tactical overview of the new offering, supported by industry references. |
Presentation/professionalism:
Considering professional appearance of the work. Appropriate language (3rd person, narrative, formal) and layout, use of report format (headings, subheadings, contents page)
10%
| Work not submitted OR evidence of serious academic misconduct.
No evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to Level 4
| Insufficient structure and organisation
Meanings are often unclear due to frequent linguistic errors
Sections incomplete or irrelevant.
Requires significant improvement.
| Adequate structure and organisation
Not all sections relate to other sections
Difficulties may have occurred in conveying the meaning at times
Should be expanded further
| Good structure and organisation
Sections generally relate to other sections
Infequent dificulties in conveying the meaning at times
Could be expanded further
| Very good structure and organisation
Sections relate well to the other sections
Occassional difficulty conveying meaning
Very good ability to select relevant sources | Excellent structure and organisation
Sections relate very well to other sections
Excellent ability to convey message
Excellent ability to select relevant sources | Outstanding structure and organisation
Sections are developed in relation to other sections
Outstanding ability to convey message
Outstanding ability to select relevant sources | Exemplary structure and organisation
Sections are develop in depth in relation to other sections
Exemplary ability to convey message
Exemplary ability to select relevant sources |
Reference list scrutiny (Depth/quality of research, APA usage):
Considering the quality, depth and breadth of the research, looking for a good balance academic research (journal articles, textbooks), accuracy of APA formatting. Avoiding unsuitable/poor quality resources e.g., Wikipedia, Marketing91, Tutor4U, QuickMBA etc.
10%
| Work not submitted OR evidence of serious academic misconduct.
No evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to Level 4
| Insufficient references
Extremely poor quality references if any
No balance between industry information and academic research | Adequate references
Adequate balance between industry information and academic research | Good quality references
Good balance between industry information and academic research | Very good quality references
Very good balance between industry information and academic research | Excellent quality references
Excellent balance between industry information and academic research | Outstanding quality references
Outstanding balance between industry information and academic research | Exemplary quality references and depth of research.
An exemplary balance between industry information and academic research |
Send Your assignment brief
Share your assignment brief and after Checking assignment requirement expert Will share the quote
Get Quote and pay
Once quote is sent, you can make Payment through secure option after which our team will start work
Get Assignment
Our team will Deliver the work you can share If any feedback