Assignment help

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.

Card image cap

MBA7061 Strategy Planning Assignment Help

MBA7061 Strategy

Assessment Brief - AS1

Assessment Type:Portfolio (3000 Words)
Assessment Title(weighting): Assessment 1– Strategic Planning - Portfolio– 70% (Group and Individual)
Word Count 3000 Words
Learning Outcomes:2,3,4
Submission  Date:17th Jan 2025 (via Turnitin @23:59hrs) 

Learning Outcomes Assessed

LO2Critically examine the complex challenges faced in the development, implementation and evaluation of strategic choices
LO3Critically evaluate and synthesise information and data from appropriate sources and use these to make informed judgments in relation to strategic options within contemporary global commercial and non-commercial contexts.
LO4Formulate and justify innovative, evidenced-based strategic proposals and solutions.

Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Applications in this Assessment 

AI StatusApplicationNotes
Category ANo GAI tool is permitted. 

While grammar and/or spell checkers may be used to correct individual words and sentences, the use of GAI is not allowed. This is because the learning outcomes require you to produce original assessment work without any GAI assistance

Any GAI generated content which is presented as your own original work and is not acknowledged will be assessed for academic misconduct.

Background

Throughout the module we will be examining a variety of strategy issues using a variety of research materials. Strategy in the context of contemporary business world will be explored, which includes an examination of global economic systems, instability, circular economy, new business practices, disruption, and business model innovation. Traditional and contemporary approaches to strategy, strategic thinking, and stakeholder engagement will be touched upon. Corporate, business, functional and network strategies will also be considered. 

 

Description of the assessment

This assignment will allow the students to apply the learning from the module to a topic and will be submitted in the form of aportfolio with both group and individual components.

Task: Students are required to form a group of maximum four members to undertake this assignment. The group is expected to execute a strategy analysis for a self-selected Small and Medium Scale Enterprise (SME)from any industry. This then leads to developing a strategic plan, with justification and evidence-based strategic recommendation for organization improvements. 

Group Area - 

  • Executive Summary – covering all the areas of the assignment (250 words)
  • Letter of Recommendation –(250 words)
  • Supporting annexures 

Individual Area –

Section A: Strategic Challenges 

Choose one of the three main theoretical schools of strategic management—Business School, Positioning School or Resource-Based View (RBV)—to focus on throughout this assessment. In this section, address the following:

  • Discuss how your understanding of the chosen theory has developed during the module and why you selected this theory over the other two.
  • Reflect on how your knowledge of the history of strategic management has evolved in relation to your chosen school of thought. (600 words)

Section B: Strategic Choices 

Based on your analysis of current industry trends, evaluate the strategic options/choices potentially available for your organisation, providing theoretical support to frame your discussion propose a 3-year strategic plan that will help the company achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. Address the following:

  • Provide a strategic vision and mission.
  • Outline key strategic goals for the next three years.
  • Develop an implementation plan to achieve these goals. (600 words)

Section C  : Strategic Evaluation 

Using the strategic management theory you selected in Section A, critically evaluate the current strategic position of your chosen organisation from Section B. Assess the complex challenges faced in the development, implementation and evaluation. Applying your theoretical knowledge to assess the strategic options available to the company. (600 words)

Section D: Strategy Selection and Conclusion

Reflect on your own understanding of the theory and consider the limitations of your chosen approach. Additionally, evaluate how governance, ethics, and corporate social responsibility are impacted by your strategic recommendations. (500 words and 200 for conclusion)

Important Information for the Portfolio 

  1. Students are asked to form into groups themselves between Week One and Week Three. Once formed, students are required to self-allocate themselves into a group in Canvas so they can start online group collaborationin Canvas. ( they can also use any other platform for team collaboration)
  2. Those students who still have not joineda group by the end of Week Three will be randomly allocated to a group by their lecturer. 
  3. Students are required to collaborate with their group members using tools such as group discussion forum in Canvas.5% marks are allocated to online collaboration. Evidencesto  demonstrate theironline group collaboration in Canvas or any other platform are to be added in the Appendix section of the portfolio (no word limits on this).
  4. Provide the full Harvard reference within the reference page for each item used, and the correct Harvard ‘shortened’ reference within the portfolio. 
  5. Include both direct and indirect citations from a wide variety of sources. Include between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include four refereed academic journals and five academic books.
  6. Make use of relevant core texts and research items from within the module. 
  7. Your cover page would be the first page of your group portfolio. Ensure in your cover page,the names and IDs of all members are included as well as the module name, tutor name, academic year/cohort/group. 
  8. The assignment will be submitted as a single file.
  9. Only one person in the group will make summative submission via Turnitin.

 

Structure and Format for Assignment 2

Format and Structure Weightage 
Title Page 
Executive Summary5%
Letter of Recommendation5%
Strategic Challenges20%
Strategic Choices20%
Strategic Evaluations20%
Strategy Selection and Conclusion20%
References and Appendices and supporting annexures5%
Proof of participation of Online Collaboration 5%

 

Minimum Secondary Research Source Requirements for both assignments:

Level HE7 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include four refereed academic journals and five academic books.

 

Important and helpful information

Late work will be subject to the penalties:

  • Up to 7 calendar days late = 10 marks subtracted but if the assignment would normally gain a pass mark, then the final mark to be no lower than the pass mark for the assignment. 
  • More than 7 calendar days late This will be counted as non-submission and no marks will be recorded.
  • Late submission of assessments on refer and those which are graded Pass/Fail only, is not permitted. Students may request an extension to the original published deadline date as described below. 

Please refer to the Module Guide for information regarding indicative reading, guidelines

for the preparation and submission of assignments, and the assessment criteria.

 

Submission, Assessment & Feedback

Electronic copies of assignments should be submitted via “Turn-it-in”. Please ensure you

follow the instructions provided by your module tutor and on the assessment brief.

Written feedback in the form of annotations onto your electronic submission and summary

comments will be provided within three working weeks of the submission deadline,

together with your internally moderated grade for the assignment.

This assessment satisfies the learning outcomes as specified in your module guide.

The pass mark for this assignment is 50%.

 Guidelines for Written Assessments Level HE7 

 

 

 

 

 

%

Executive Summary

Letter of Recommendation

Strategic Challenges

Strategic Choices

 

 

Strategic Evaluations

Strategy Selection and Conclusion

 

StructurePresentationWritten EnglishResearch/Referencing
DISTINCTION
Exceptional Quality
85-100%

Directly relevant to title/brief.

Expertly addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.

 

Demonstrates an exceptional knowledge of theory and practice for this level.

Insightfully interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. 

Demonstrates originality in conceptual understanding. 

Presents an exceptional critique of key research material resulting in clear, original and illuminating conclusions.

Demonstrates distinctive, insightful and creative solutions to complex problems.

Produces exceptional work that makes a contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area.

Coherently articulated and logically structured.

 

An appropriate format is used.   

Exceptional presentational style & layout, appropriate to the type of assignment.

Effective inclusion of figures, tables, plates (FTP).

 

Exceptionally well written
answer with standard spelling and grammar. 

Style is clear, resourceful and academic.

 

Sources accurately cited in the text. 

 

An extensive range of contemporary and relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style.

Excellent Quality70-84%

Directly relevant to title/brief.

 

Expertly addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.

 

Demonstrates an excellent knowledge of theory and practice for this level.

Expertly interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models.  

Demonstrates originality in conceptual understanding. 

Presents an excellent critique of key research material resulting in clear, original and illuminating conclusions.

Demonstrates insightful and creative thinking solutions to complex problems.

Produces excellent work that makes a contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area.

Coherently articulated and logically structured.

 

An appropriate format is used.   

Excellent presentational style & layout, appropriate to the type of assignment.

Effective inclusion of figures, tables, plates (FTP).

 

Excellently written
answer with standard spelling and grammar. 

Style is clear, resourceful and academic.

 

Sources accurately cited in the text. 

A wide range of contemporary and relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style.

MERITGood Quality60-69%

Directly relevant to title/brief. 

 

Addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief well.

Demonstrates a sound knowledge of theory and practice for this level.

Comprehensively interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. 

Demonstrates originality in conceptual understanding

Presents a cohesive critique of key research material resulting in clear and original conclusions.

Demonstrates creative solutions to complex problems.

Produces superior work that makes a contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area

For the most part coherently articulated and logically constructed.

 

An appropriate format is used.   

Very good presentational style & layout, appropriate to the type of assignment.

Effective inclusion of FTP.

Well written with
standard spelling and grammar. Style is clear and academic.

 

Sources accurately cited in the text. 

A range of contemporary and relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style.

PASSSatisfactory Quality50-59%

Generally addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.

 

 

Minor irrelevance in places.

Demonstrates an adequate knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Some minor omissions.

Satisfactorily interprets some appropriate concepts and theoretical models. 

Demonstrates some originality in conceptual understanding.

Presents some critique of key research material resulting in original conclusions. Loss of focus in places.

Demonstrates some creativity in solving complex problems.

Produces satisfactory work that makes some contribution to the development of knowledge and understanding in the subject area.

Adequate attempt at articulation and logical structure. 

 

An acceptable format is used.

The presentational style & layout is largely correct for the type of assignment.

 

Inclusion of FTP but lacks selectivity.

Competently written with minor lapses in spelling and grammar.

 

Style is legible and mainly academic.

 

Key contemporary and relevant academic sources are drawn upon.

 

Most sources are accurately cited in the text and reference list/bibliography.

Minor weaknesses evident. 

FAILBorderline Fail45-49%

Some implications of issues explored.

 

Some irrelevant and/or superficial arguments.

 

Some omissions evident in knowledge of theory and practice at this level.

Insufficient understanding of appropriate concepts and theoretical models. 

Demonstrates some conceptual understanding in places.

A limited amount of critique of key research material with description in places.  Lacks creativity. Some original conclusions.

 

 

Limited attempt at articulation and problems with structure. 

 

Some formatting errors.

Some weaknesses in the presentational style & layout.

 

Some inappropriate use of FTP.

Intermittent lapses in grammar and spelling.

 

Style hinders clarity in places and is not academic throughout.

Limited number of contemporary and relevant sources cited. Weaknesses in referencing technique.
Fail

 

30-44%

 

Significant degree of irrelevance to the title and/or brief. 

 

Issues are addressed at a superficial level and in unchallenging terms. 

Demonstrates weaknesses in knowledge of theory and practice for this level.

Limited understanding and application of concepts. 

A basic argument is presented, but too descriptive or narrative in style. 

Limited originality and creativity.

Conclusions are not clearly stated.

Poorly structured. Lack of articulation.

Format deficient.

For the type of assignment the presentational style &/or layout is lacking. 

 

FTP ignored in text or not used where clearly needed.

Deficiencies in spelling and grammar make reading difficult in places.

 

Simplistic or repetitious style impairs clarity.

Inappropriate sources and poor referencing technique.   

 

 

Need assignment help in Australia? Visit "Punjab assignment help."

Send Your assignment brief

Share your assignment brief and after Checking assignment requirement expert Will share the quote

Get Quote and pay

Once quote is sent, you can make Payment through secure option after which our team will start work

Get Assignment

Our team will Deliver the work you can share If any feedback