Assignment help
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c12e3/c12e384015d69b34243dd184115e0376a44d42a7" alt=""
Join our 150К of happy users
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c41f/6c41f84b6f1d89bbec8a5f95daeaca63bf6b85ee" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d16e/4d16e6bafacfc63b86d46389ff26388536d4f2d6" alt="Card image cap"
MBA7066 - Innovation and Entreprenuership Assignment Help
MBA7066 Innovation and Entreprenuership 2024-2025
Assessment Brief
Assessment Number | AS1 |
Assessment Type (and weighting) | Portfolio - 5000 words (100%) |
Assessment Name | New Venture Business Plan |
Assessment Submission Date | 9th May 2025 |
Learning Outcomes Assessed
LO1. Demonstrate a systematic and critical understanding of contemporary tools, techniques, and strategies for innovation management, entrepreneurial thinking, opportunity evaluation, and the development of new ventures. |
LO2 . Critically evaluate market opportunities, technology developments, and available resources, including sources of capital, and synthesise findings to support innovative value propositions and new ventures. |
LO3. Identify and critically evaluate and interrelate stakeholder interests and key risks, including financial, commercial, technical, and legal risks, in the context of a new venture, and propose and justify strategies for managing these complex issues. |
LO4. Develop a cogent and justified a business plan for a new venture to respond to an evidenced-based market opportunity support by a critical analysis of key risks and key stakeholder interests. |
For more insights and expert support, explore our Assignment Help and Assignment Guidelines at HND Assignment Help.
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Applications in this Assessment
AI Status | Application | Notes |
Category B | GAI can be used to assist you with the assessment.
You can use ChatGPT or any GAI for task 3 and task 4. | Grammar and/or spell checkers may be used to correct individual words and sentences.
Task 3 - You can use ChatGPT to perform the steps or generate the template using any one of the three models of stakeholder’s analysis, (Mendelow’s,Salience or RACI matrix model). But the content discussion must be your own relevant to your chosen new venture.
Task 3 - You can also use ChatGPT in the risk analysis to perform the steps or use the risk matrix chat. But the content discussion must be in your own words, relevant to your chosen new venture.
|
ChatGPT or GAI is only allowed to generate steps for task 3 and task 4. But content discussion is not allowed using ChatGPT or any GAI. The content should be contextualised to your chosen new venture in your own words support by relevant referencing (and in-text citation).
Any GAI generated content which is presented as your own original work and is not acknowledged will be assessed for academic misconduct.
|
Assessment Task
Scenario:
Midlands Green Innovation Fund (MGIF)
In a significant development this year, the Midlands Green Innovation Fund (MGIF) has reached a remarkable milestone, having provided over £900 million in direct and private sector co-investment to emerging and expanding enterprises. Recognising the urgent need to drive innovation in response to climate change and to promote sustainable development, MGIF has announced the launch of a new fund dedicated to green and sustainable innovations
This initiative primarily focuses on fostering creativity, entrepreneurship, and business development within critical areas such as sustainable practices, renewable energy, eco-friendly products, and the reduction of carbon footprints. These areas are essential to achieving the climate change targets.
To support this endeavour, MGIF has allocated £180 million to finance greener and sustainable innovations, particularly during the start-up phase or in the early stages of operation. MGIF is prepared to invest up to £800,000 in each project that falls within the categories of sustainability, renewable energy, eco-friendly products, social innovation, Fintech, and carbon footprint reduction.
To qualify for this funding, applicants must:
- Select any onesocial enterprise from the categories: sustainability, renewable energy, eco-friendly products, social innovation, fintech, and carbon footprint reduction.
- Ensure that the proposed venture meets the specific criteria of MGIF to secure the £800,000 funding.
- Propose a new venture supported by evidence-based market opportunity and meet the above conditions of MGIF to secure the £800,000 funding.
The business development plan portfolio has two parts - Part 1 and Part 2.
Part 1: should be completed before the 8thweek. Part 1 needs to be approved by the lecturer before students can proceed with Part 2.
Part 1 - Pitch (10-minute presentation) – Formative Assessment
Pitchthe new venturein class to be approved by the lecturer. You should have up to 10 slides. Presentation time: 10 minutes and should include:
a) Context of new social venture in your chosen area;
b) Evidence-based critical analysis in support of your new venture;
c) Identify the relevant stakeholders, risks and resources required.
Part 2 – Business Development Plan Report with 5000 words - Summative Assessment
Produce a 5000-word business plan for your new venture, which answers all five tasks of the assignment brief. The structure should be as follows:
Task 1.Executive Summary and Introduction.(15%)
Critically evaluate social entrepreneurship as part of Innovation and Entrepreneurial thinking.(300 words)
Task2- Entrepreneurial Thinking, Market Opportunity Evaluation and Value Proposition. (30%)
Introduce your chosen new venturewith value proposition,the mission and the vision. A critical analysis of evidence-based market opportunity. Analysis should be supported by facts and figures. Additionally synthesise findings to support innovative value proposition for the new venture. Also include a critical evaluation of resources implications and key partners your new venture.(2000 words)
Task 3.Stakeholders and Risk Analysis. (25%)
Critically evaluate stakeholders’ analysis and risk analysis related to your new venture.
For stakeholders’ analysis select any one of the three models from Mendelow’s model, Salience Model, RACI matrix model, apply the selected model to your stakeholder’s analysis and justify the selection of the model. While performing the risk analysis, ensure you cover financial, commercial, technical, and legal risks using risk matrix chart.(1500 words)
You can use AI for this Task3to generate steps / template of the models for stakeholder analysis and risk analysis matrix. However, the content discussion should be your own in the context of your chosen new venture with relevant references.
Task 4. Develop and justify your strategy for the new venture using any one of these three models (Business Canvas, Hybrid or Social Business)or any other appropriate model you select justifying the suitability of the chosen model. (700 words)
Task 5: Conclusion (500 words)
Reference List (Not included in word count)
- Appendix (Not included in the word count)
- PowerPoint Slides from Part 1 (Not included in the word count)
Important information
Declaration: At the end of the assessment, you should also include a declaration of any software tools including Generative AI (GAI) applications that you used in developing and completing the assessment. |
Minimum Secondary Research Sources Requirements
References - Level HE7
It is expected that the Reference List will contain.
As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include:
- between fifteen to twenty sources
- four refereed academic journals
- five academic books
- DO NOT USE: Wikipedia, blogs or untrustworthy sources of information as references otherwise you will lose marks.
Citations and references should follow the Harvard Referencing System: see https://www.bolton.ac.uk/leaponline/My-Academic-Development/My-Writing-Techniques/Referencing/Level-2/Harvard-Referencing.aspx.
Specific Assessment Criteria/Marking Scheme:
Appendix A - Provides a rubric identifying specific assessment criteria (rubric) for the elements identified in the proforma feedback sheet.
Appendix A – Specific Assessment Criteria (Rubric)
Exceptional 85-100% | Excellent 70-84% | Good 60-69% | Satisfactory 50-59% | Borderline Fail 45-49% | Fail Below 45% | |
Executive Summary and Introduction to Social Enterprise (15%) | Outstanding ES. Demonstrates an exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice on social enterprise | Excellent ES. Demonstrates an excellent breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice on social enterprise. | A very good ES. Demonstrates a thorough breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice on social enterprise | Satisfactory ES. Demonstrates a sufficient breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice on social enterprise. | ES does not reflect the report. Some omissions evident in knowledge and understanding of theory and practice on social enterprise
| ES does not reflect the report. Demonstrates inadequate knowledge and understanding of theory and practice on social enterprise.
|
Entrepreneurial thinking, Market Opportunity Evaluation and Value proposition of the New business venture (30%) | Holistic critical review of the new venture idea. Report sections outlined and interrelated. Critical synthesis of market opportunities, technology developments, and available resources, including sources of capital Synthesised findings to support innovative value propositions in the new ventures Clear justification of models supported by brief critical review of alternatives. | Succinct critical review of the new venture idea. Critical evaluation of market opportunities, technology developments, and available resources, including sources of capital. Synthesised findings to support innovative value propositions in the new ventures drawn from high quality sources. Clear justification of models. supported by summary review of alternatives. | Summary of review of the new venture idea. Good overview and justification of market opportunities, technology developments, and available resources, including sources of capital. Good analysis to support innovative value propositions in the new ventures | Coherent outline of the new venture idea. Outline of report sections. Coherent discussion on market opportunities, technology developments, and available resources, including sources of capital. Explanations on innovative value propositions in the new ventures. Further critical analysis and justification of models chosen would strengthen. | Limited or superficial treatment of new venture idea. Report sections not linked clearly. Discussion missing or incomplete on market opportunities, technology developments, and available resources, including sources of capital. Few, if any alternatives considered. | Weak justification of new venture idea and missed some of the sections of the report. Discussion of models is superficial and lacks critical engagement; some of the models may be irrelevant. Justification of market opportunities, technology developments, and available resources, including sources of capital is missing. No alternatives considered. |
Stakeholders and Risk Analysis (25%) | Insightful, holistic critical analysis; of Stakeholders interests, strategies and different types of risk | Integrated critical analysis; of Stakeholders interests, strategies and different types of risk | Effective critical analysis; of Stakeholders interests, strategies, and different types of risk | Strong analysis, of Stakeholders interests, strategies and different types of risk | Application of models is incomplete, and analysis of Stakeholders interests, strategies and different types of risk is limited. | Key elements may be missing or incomplete. For example, analysis is lacking; the model(s) are used descriptively rather than for analysis, e.g., of Stakeholders interests, strategies, and different types of risk |
Strategy development and conclusion (15%) | Holistic, critical review of Strategy development and Valid proposed strategy for developing the new venture | Succinct, critical review of Strategy development and Valid proposed strategy for developing the new venture | Strategies applied were critically reviewed and their effectiveness related to the strategy development. | Strategies applied were satisfactorily reviewed and their effectiveness related to the strategy development. | Limited review of Strategies applied, and their effectiveness related to the strategy development. | Key elements of strategy development and weak justification of the proposed strategy |
Format, Structure and Referencing (10%)
| Coherently articulated and logically structured the business plan and an appropriate format is used. | For the most part coherently articulated and logically structured the business plan and mostly followed the appropriate format | Adequate attempt at articulation and logical structure of the business plan and an acceptable format used. | Limited attempt at articulation and problems with structure of the business plan. Some formatting errors. Some of the sources may be a little outdated. | Poorly structured. Lack of articulation of the business plan. Format deficient and sources may be a little outdated. | Unstructured the business plan. Lack of articulation.
Format deficient. Limited engagement with appropriate literature: sources are dated and/or of poor quality. |
Conclusion ( 5%) | Conclusion well developed and show some originality. They form an integrated part of the overall argument and/or discussion, reflecting a strong grasp of theory and/or evidence and/or literature and appropriate forms of conceptualisation. | Conclusions well developed and analytical. They are thoroughly grounded in theory and/or evidence and/or literature and use appropriate forms of conceptualisation, forming a clear part of overall argument and/or discussion. | Conclusions show some development and critical insight, and relate clearly and logically to evidence and/or theory and/or literature. | Sound conclusions are drawn which are clearly derived from evidence and/or theory and/or literature. | Adequate conclusions are drawn which are derived from limited understanding of evidence and/or theory and/or literature. | Limited or ineffective attempt to draw together arguments. |
Need reliable assignment help? Punjab Assignment Help provides expert tutoring and academic support for Australian students.
Send Your assignment brief
Share your assignment brief and after Checking assignment requirement expert Will share the quote
Get Quote and pay
Once quote is sent, you can make Payment through secure option after which our team will start work
Get Assignment
Our team will Deliver the work you can share If any feedback